The Materiality Judgment Gap: An experimental study
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Counterfactual thinking in moral judgment: an experimental study
Counterfactual thinking is thinking about a past that did not happen. This is often the case in "if only…" situations, where we wish something had or had not happened. To make a choice in a moral decision-making situation is particularly hard and, therefore, may be often associated with the imagination of a different outcome. The main aim of the present study is to investigate counterfactual th...
متن کاملManagerial Judgment and Forecast Combination" An Experimental Study
This paper examines the role of managerial judgment in forming a final forecast, or judging the achievability of a critical level of sales, when multiple forecasts or opinions are available to the decision maker. Several factors that can help improve the quality of human intervention are identified and incorporated in a decision ard. Experimental results show that aided combination can help the...
متن کاملan investigation about the relationship between insurance lines and economic growth; the case study of iran
مطالعات قبلی بازار بیمه را به صورت کلی در نظر می گرفتند اما در این مطالعه صنعت بیمه به عنوان متغیر مستفل به بیمه های زندگی و غیر زندگی شکسته شده و هم چنین بیمه های زندگی به رشته های مختلف بیمه ای که در بازار بیمه ایران سهم قابل توجهی دارند تقسیم میشود. با استفاده از روشهای اقتصاد سنجی داده های برای دوره های 48-89 از مراکز ملی داده جمع آوری شد سپس با تخمین مدل خود بازگشتی برداری همراه با تعدادی ...
15 صفحه اولThe meaning of materiality: reconsidering the materiality of Gramscian IR
Gramsican approaches in International Relations (IR) have sought to outline the relationship between ideas and material forces in the construction of world order. Scholars working within this broad school have sought to emphasise that ideas are material forces, and must be considered as concrete historical structures (Cox, 1987) central to the establishment of particular historical and hegemoni...
متن کاملSelecting judgment aggregation rules for NAO robots: an experimental approach
Social choice rules can be used to reach group decisions in multiagent systems. We consider judgment aggregation, the problem of aggregating answers to binary logically related questions. In general ”fairness” is usually considered to be the main concern when selecting a social choice rule, however we believe that in judgment aggregation often a more relevant property is how efficient the rule ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: مجلة البحوث التجاریة
سال: 2017
ISSN: 2735-4512
DOI: 10.21608/zcom.2017.132493